San Jacinto Group

San Jacinto GroupSan Jacinto GroupSan Jacinto Group

San Jacinto Group

San Jacinto GroupSan Jacinto GroupSan Jacinto Group
  • Home
  • AA Pilots ALPA History
  • TWA ALPA History
  • Eagle ALPA History
  • Recall Brian Smith
  • APA As a Leader
  • False ALPA Narratives
  • The Longest Election
  • Delta Pilots Assn “DPA”
  • UAL 4/3/3 Pro Negotiators
  • ALPA DFR Losses
  • AWAPPA = ALPA
  • Management Wants ALPA
  • Battle of San Jacinto
  • More
    • Home
    • AA Pilots ALPA History
    • TWA ALPA History
    • Eagle ALPA History
    • Recall Brian Smith
    • APA As a Leader
    • False ALPA Narratives
    • The Longest Election
    • Delta Pilots Assn “DPA”
    • UAL 4/3/3 Pro Negotiators
    • ALPA DFR Losses
    • AWAPPA = ALPA
    • Management Wants ALPA
    • Battle of San Jacinto
  • Home
  • AA Pilots ALPA History
  • TWA ALPA History
  • Eagle ALPA History
  • Recall Brian Smith
  • APA As a Leader
  • False ALPA Narratives
  • The Longest Election
  • Delta Pilots Assn “DPA”
  • UAL 4/3/3 Pro Negotiators
  • ALPA DFR Losses
  • AWAPPA = ALPA
  • Management Wants ALPA
  • Battle of San Jacinto

Preserving our representation

Preserving our representationPreserving our representationPreserving our representation

Preserving our representation

Preserving our representationPreserving our representationPreserving our representation
Who is San Jacinto?

San Jacinto Group

San Jacinto Group was formed to preserve the APA as the bargaining representative for the professional pilots of American Airlines. Our goal is to educate pilots on the pros of APA as well as the history of problems with ALPA. 

Why  “San Jacinto Group”? San Jacinto was a decisive battle which secured Texas independence

Click here to learn more about the battle.

DFW’s Brian Smith Running Rogue

Running for DFW Chair while giving the finger to the APA Appeal Board

You should be disappointed in the unity of our APA leaders. You should be disappointed in DFW Chair, Brian Smith for sowing that disunity. Captain Smith led the charge to decertify our union before becoming DFW Chair and kept the effort online while serving on the Board of Directors. 


How can you expect APA to negotiate in strength when the chair in DFW, in concert with others, has done his best to undermine APA?


Brian Smith was charged, found cognizable, then determined by the Appeal Board to be unfit to serve a second term. Why is he on the current ballot for DFW Chair? The Appeal Board determination, at the end of APA’s Article 7 process stated, “CA Brian Smith engaged in acts contrary to the best interests of the APA as an institution.“


The punishment handed down by the APA Appeal Board, “3. CA Smith – After the completion of CA Smith’s present elected term, he shall be prohibited from holding any APA position of trust, including elected or appointed APA positions, for a period of 5 years.”


The weakness of the punishment is in appeal and mediation. Unfortunately, the DFW election is occurring prior to the end of that appeal. CA Smith has chosen to ignore the potentialities and to open the union to an election appeal or worse by running for office.

Source: [APPEAL BOARD DECISION IN RE: ARTICLE VII CHARGES CA Michael Phelan v. CA Jeffrey Kerr & CA

Brian Smith]


Brian Smith’s freewill actions to support AAPILOTS4ALPA as their best card collector and communicator injured our chances for an efficient Section 6 process at best; and, at the same time negatively impacted the strength of the current negotiating position for APA’s ALPA Merger negotiating Committee. These actions were poor choices at best, and potentially supportive of AA and ALPA or another outside agency. At worst, DFW Chair Brian Smith is unfit to occupy any position in APA let alone the seat he seeks despite the Appeal Board ruling stating he may not seek re-election.


Brian Smith was found guilty of not acting in the best interest of this union, the APA, and punishment for the same prohibited running a campaign or seeking office for a second term. Yet he is arrogantly refusing to honor our Appeal Board.



Brian Smith provided support to AAPILOTS4ALPA while he occupied APA national positions. In return, AAPILOTS4ALPA provided support for candidates like Brian Smith just as they said they would on their donations page where AAPILOTS4ALPA solicited APA members for financial support.

(screenshot from AAPILOTS4ALPA donations page)“AA Pilots 4 ALPA is a non-profit labor organization comprised of American Airlines pilots for the benefit of American Airlines pilots. Our sole mission is to seek union representation by the Air Line Pilots Association for all American Airlines pilots. Your financial contributions will be used solely for educational, campaign, and election materials, as well as professional services to support our mission.“



AAPILOTS4ALPA was formed solely to destroy APA. Brian Smith worked for the success of AAPLILOTS4ALPA collecting 400 or more cards himself.


(from the State of Arizona Secretary of State)

ARTICLE III - ORGANIZATIONAL PURPOSE

This (AAPILOTS4ALPA) corporation is organized and shall be operated as a nonprofit corporation solely and exclusively by American Airlines pilots for the sole purpose of improving wages and working conditions by way of organizing the Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA) as the

recognized collective bargaining agent for the pilots of American Airlines pursuant to the Railway Labor Act (45 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.) Without limiting the generality of the foregoing or the character of the affairs that the corporation shall conduct in the future, the corporation initially shall conduct the following business: distributing educational and promotional materials to American Airlines pilots in order garner grassroots support for the organizing effort, retention of legal counsel to advise of organizing options, and distribution and collection of materials necessary to foster a union election for the American Airlines pilots.


The efforts of Brian Smith and AAPILOTS4ALPA took place during the last Section 6 contract negotiations of APA, at a minimum the effort gave space for AA to delay concluding negotiations as AA likely waited to see if they needed to negotiate with APA this would

have made the need for a contract less compelling for AA. AA could delay paying higher wages or improving working conditions.


AAPILOTS4ALPA whom Brian Smith gave support to, was formed as a labor organization.

(from the State of Arizona Secretary of State)

ARTICLE IV - NONPROFIT LABOR ORGANIZATION

This corporation shall be a nonprofit corporation and shall have no stock, and no dividends or pecuniary profits shall be declared or paid to the directors hereof or to any other private individual. All the earnings and property of the corporation shall be used to further the purposes and objects of the corporation as set forth herein. No net earnings shall insure to any director or pilot. All directors are required to be employed as pilots for American Airlines, Inc.


Which labor organization is Brian Smith committed too? We are again opening Section 6 contract negotiations.

Clarity and focus on perhaps getting profit sharing and better pay and/ work rules here at APA rather than at some alternate agency may have delivered those items if CA Smith, as the chair of the largest domicile, had prioritized them previously. Perhaps they would be in your possession, instead he diluted our union’s solidarity and the company’s focus on APA while AA considered the ‘what if’.



From the Federal Laws pertaining to labor law:

452.44 Dual unionism. While the Act does not prohibit a person from maintaining membership or holding office in more than one labor organization, it would be considered reasonable for a union to bar from candidacy for office persons who hold membership in a rival labor organization. source: (CFR Title 29/Subtitle B/Chapter IV/Subchapter A/Para 452/Subpart E)


The federal government realizes the issue, why not Brian Smith?



From transcripts of the Article 7 hearing: (cited from the Appeal Board final decision as found on their committed website Page 18 of the Appeal Board document)

“C. Captain Brian Smith Shortly after the AA Pilots 4 ALPA card drive started, CA Smith stepped down from his position on the APA Communications Committee and began devoting time to support the card drive effort. Tr. 761-762; PT-08. After receiving training from CA Boulanger, CA Smith “frequently” collected cards from other pilots, and, in his words, “I was really good at it.” Tr. 762:20-24, 815:11-18. CA Smith told one witness that that he had collected roughly 400

authorization cards and, in addition, had instructed other pilots how to complete and return them directly. Tr. 120:4-121:23 (CA Pacheco). CA Kerr referred to CA Smith as “one of our strongest

card collectors that we have on the roster.” Tr. 996:6-25. CA Smith testified that when he became involved in the card drive, he thought he was joining a “grass roots effort” and was unaware of any organization behind it. Tr. 765:8-766:7. He also claimed to have “never even heard the word[] ‘decertify’ until” long after he became involved in collecting cards. Tr.781. CA Smith testified that he ceased any person-to-person card collection efforts after his election in early 2024, Tr. 770:6-9, but did concede that a website he had created to support his campaign for DFW Domicile Chair continued to be publicly available for many months after his election, and during that post-election period contained pages urging pilots to “Sign a Card to Demand a Vote and Voice” which included a link for authorization cards. Tr. 776:2-777:2, 778:11-25; WP14. The record does not indicate if any pilots viewed his webpage after his election, or clicked through for a card. Like CA Boulanger and other charged parties, CA Smith testified that his personal primary goal in collecting cards was to “leverage” the Board of Directors. Tr. 787:1-5.

“I was collecting cards for the purpose of, hopefully, being able to convince those on the Board ... that there was a sufficient amount of interest to move forward with Phase 2.” Tr. 815:19-816:1.9 However, in his December 2023 podcast, CA Smith plainly stated that he had the initialview that collecting cards would get “the board [to] listen” to demands for merger negotiations, but he subsequently concluded that “that probably won’t happen,” and that “at this point, my

opinion the only way ... to have a say in where go forward ... is through a membership-driven grassroots process to get that vote on the table after an NMB-facilitated education process and a vote.” PT-08 at 3; see also id. At 6 (“once we get through the threshold, there is going to be a proper NMB election ... Signing the card is saying, hey, I would like the NMB to come in here”) (emphasis added).10 And in early August 2024, CA Smith confidently predicted that if AA Pilots 4 ALPA “got 7,900 cards, they will take them to ALPA.

” Tr. 285:5-19, Tr. 763:2-23. Contrary to his podcast statements, CA Smith testified that he was not involved in the card drive for the purpose of decertifying APA, Tr. 781:8-24. However, he also testified to

understanding that if the APA Board of Directors did not agree to proceed with merger negotiations, the cards would be provided to ALPA which could then submit them to the NMB for the purpose of replacing APA as the collective bargaining representative, Tr. 783:6-17 (CA

Smith called ALPA President Ambrosi to ask what ALPA would do if it had the cards, because he wanted to ensure that it “was not necessarily the first thing they would do is run to the NMB with them” absent “an opportunity to still go down the merger path”); Tr. 816:2-22 (expressing

9 CA Smith emphatically testified that “I am not pro-ALPA ... I think APA is pretty dang awesome. Guess what, I think they can be better, and it might be worth letting the membership find out ... Don't know if I’d vote for ALPA if we do have a vote.” Tr. 773:3-21. CA Smith testified that “you can read why I was collecting cards on my podcast.” Tr. 781:19-20.


CA Smith maintained a website soliciting the decertification of APA by collecting cards from members, “he was really good at it” after he became elected to the APA BOD, CA Smith at all times prior to winning DFW chair collected and solicited cards from members. The only thing cards are legally used for is to run a decertification vote to destroy a union, the union was APA. At the time this took

place we were trying to negotiate a contract with APA. Those cards and the union internal data was to be shared directly with ALPA, the same that we go to negotiating a merger with our hands tied thanks to the actions of AAPILOTS4ALPA. During the Article 7 Hearing it was made perfectly clear by others that the cards would be delivered to ALPA. Hard to negotiate when you have less or no leverage.



Conclusion

CA Smith has been officially notified by the Appeal Board that he may not serve a second term. Yet is running. If somehow he wins; that result will most certainly be challenged in the DOL OLMS office in Dallas. The most honorable thing he could have done was to accept the result and await the appeal process result. Instead, he has chosen to hope that a mediator will overlook his own words freely stating that he was “good” at soliciting cards to decertify the union, and that he maintained a website while the APA BOD in furtherance of collecting cards, that that process with a mediator will somehow ignore his own actions to destroy APA. Brian Smith is not fit to serve in the capacity he seeks. We are once again approaching Section 6 contract negotiations. Brian Smith is putting himself ahead of the membership needs as if he is the only one to deliver quality negotiations. To the contrary, he has damaged our leverage in the upcoming Section 6 contract negotiations and destroyed any leverage of our APA ALPA Merger Negotiating Committee.


A vote for Brian Smith as DFW Chair will cost APA and you money and leverage going forward. Pick another candidate now. If you really need to check a box next to Brian Smith’s name, do it on the recall page and not on a ballot.


Latest News on the ALPA Takeover

Takeaways of the AAMNC Winter Briefing to the Board by DCA CH Wachter

Today, the AAMNC briefed your Board of Directors on the current status of negotiations with ALPA. Video of the open presentation should be located here by Tuesday morning. While neither party is claiming that an agreement is impossible, the most recent pass from ALPA suggests we remain far apart in terms of cost and membership priorities.

As indicated by recent polling and our guidance to the AAMNC, APA pilots have a clear expectation of any proposed merger agreement: maintain dues at an acceptable level while ensuring the protections of our dedicated staff and key APA-provided services.

The Financial Reality As outlined in today’s AAMNC presentation, the math presents a significant challenge. Even if we increased dues for American Airlines pilots by 40% (to a 1.4% rate), the AA MEC would still operate at a $16M annual deficit—roughly 43% of our required operating budget.

This deficit exists because of the robust, high-touch services APA provides: Aeromedical, IT, App Development, Benefits, Government Affairs, Contract Administration, Safety, and Scheduling. Under the current ALPA proposal:

  • AA pilots would pay an estimated $80M+ per year in dues.
  • $43.1M would go to ALPA National to fund their centralized functions.
  • Only $37.4M would return to the AA MEC to operate locally.

This creates a stark value proposition: How much are you willing to pay, where should that money go, and—critically—what services are you willing to sacrifice?

The Five Paths Forward, as I see them:

  • Drastic Service Cuts: Reducing our 103 dedicated staff members to the 20–30 member levels seen at the Delta or United MECs.  These cuts would impact Aeromedical, Benefits and IT support currently provided by APA.
  • Higher Assessments: Increasing dues beyond the proposed 1.4% rate to cover the $16M shortfall, to an estimated rate of 1.678%, essentially requiring AA pilots to pay more than anyone else at ALPA in order to maintain our current services.
  • ALPA Merges our Services:  ALPA integrates and funds our key services at the ALPA National level, reducing the estimated deficit without the need for an assessment of AA pilots.
  • ALPA Structural Reform: ALPA National fundamentally changes its structure to return more dues to the MECs.
  • Status Quo: Maintaining APA’s independent 1%–1.5% dues structure.

At present, there is no logical path that meets all pilot expectations. I need to hear from you directly. What do you expect from your union representation? I am available via call, text, email reply, or SoundOff.

Strategic Collaboration On a positive note, APA has successfully repaired and restored relationships with our peer groups, including ALPA. We have opened our organizations to mutual inspection; APA has found ALPA processes worth emulating, and ALPA has expressed interest in replicating our "best-in-class" services for their own properties. Furthermore, the AAMNC’s work to lower dues rates is a win for all pilots, regardless of the merger outcome.  If we are ultimately unable to reach a mutually agreeable solution to these significant issues, I am confident that our relationships with our colleagues at ALPA will be better as we exit this process than they were when we entered.

Section 6 openers are approaching rapidly—not just for us, but for Delta and United as well. While the negotiating committees of all 3 pilot groups are now meeting regularly, our time and resources are finite. We must determine quickly if the AAMNC and ALPA negotiators can bridge this $16M gap in a manner consistent with our members’ priorities and resolve the remaining open issues.  There are no easy answers to this 'wicked problem,' and the Board is intent on continuing to discuss and debate our next steps later this week.  In order for me to best represent the will of the DCA membership I wish to move forward with clear directive on what you are—and are not—willing to sacrifice in order for us to reach a proposed merger agreement.

I look forward to hearing from you.

In Unity,

CA Chris Wachter

DCA Domicile Chair

Allied Pilots Association

(904) 423-6324
cwachter@alliedpilots.org

Message from CA Steve Pacheco, Longtime APA Pilot Volunteer

To the Chairs, Deputy Chairs, volunteers and  the Staff,


We all know why I was removed as the Membership Chair.  However, I would like to add that no one is safe if you buck the system. You must "click" with the president. You must agree with the narrative, and you must lay with those who are complicit in undermining the Allied Pilots Association. It's apparent that some can run their mouths on social media and be given a pass.  It's apparent that a lawyer can be as dirty as ever (while having his ass kicked by two pilots). The problem isn't them. It's the top.  A leader who can't lead and is a failure on so many levels. 



The independence, integrity, and future of our Association are under direct attack — and the very committees that work tirelessly to support our pilots are being systematically targeted.


Our leadership, including the President, has allowed outside influences to infiltrate and shape APA decisions, while silencing the very voices that represent our pilots. Under the pretense of acting “for the pilots,” they have instead enabled the erosion of internal accountability and the marginalization of committees and volunteers who serve with integrity. I have personally witnessed volunteers being offered positions and jobs as part of an ALPA merger — deliberate efforts to divide and influence our Association from within. This is not speculation. It is happening, and it is alarming.


Pilots absolutely have the right to choose their representation. But the acts of those complicit — including the President — are undermining that right by manipulating the narrative and concealing the truth of the work you do. Your dedication, your service, and your committee contributions are being misrepresented, dismissed, and silenced. This is not leadership — it is betrayal.


During critical meetings with ALPA, APA committees were intentionally excluded while ALPA committees were welcomed. I raised these issues directly to the Board and the President, and despite repeated warnings, nothing changed. I refused to be silent — and for that, I was removed.


Let me be clear: I was fired under the false pretense of “being needed elsewhere,” months after the President first used that excuse — a transparent attempt to disguise retaliation against someone unwilling to go along quietly.


And let us not forget the President’s own words regarding the ALPA merger and how to communicate with the pilots in the executive meeting room. 


“The pilots have the right to be stupid.”


That statement speaks volumes about the contempt and disregard shown toward the membership and the committees that serve them.


To the staff: your role is indispensable. Despite claims that “this is about the pilots,” your work and your voices are essential to the health and integrity of the Association. I urge you to remain vigilant, informed, and unafraid to question what is happening. Protect yourselves and the work you have built. Do not allow your committees, your integrity, or your livelihoods to be silenced or compromised.


For those who were lied to and replaced others — I wish you the best, and I want you to know this: you are being used. You deserve honesty, not manipulation. Do not let temporary opportunity come at the cost of your integrity or your fellow pilots.


We are at a tipping point. If we fail to act decisively, the very foundation of APA — the independence and unity that protect every pilot — could be dismantled from within. The time to stand firm and defend this Association is now.


Don’t forget. Never put your trust in a lawyer. Especially when he gets his ass handed to him by two pilots.  


I have served our pilots with honesty, transparency, and conviction. I remain proud of what we achieved together, and I trust that those who value truth over politics will not allow this Association to be taken apart in silence.


Best of luck


Merry Christmas and Happy New Year 


CA Steven Pacheco

STOP Chair

Allied Pilots Association 

3619603147

BOS Recap of $39,000+ Special BOD Meeting for ALPA Merge

AAMNC SBOD RECAP


The APA Board of Directors (BOD) convened a virtual Special Board of Directors (SBOD) meeting 17DEC, as requested by the APA-ALPA Merger Negotiation Committee (AAMNC), to receive a briefing, and provide guidance and tasking to the AAMNC on decision points that required BOD voting action. These votes can only occur when the BOD is in session (virtually or in-person). 

The APA Information Hotline (which only communicates open session information) of 17DEC, and the AAMNC update email from 18DEC, paint a much rosier picture than the closed-session briefings, deliberations and questioning that took place. It is our position that most of the meeting could have been held in open session, and that the membership has a right to know as much as possible. 


A majority of the BOD voted to keep all but the very end of the meeting in closed session, and we are forced to question why “controlling the narrative” looks to be by design, or according to a plan. When it was finally time to question the AAMNC in open session after their briefing, the meeting was adjourned by a division vote, before a single question could be asked of the AAMNC that membership could see on the recording. WHY?


Recent actions around the removal and recall of APA volunteers from prominent member-facing committees, and prohibitions against APA volunteers social-media engagement, only add to our concern that there is a desire for the APA members to only receive the narrative the AAMNC wishes you to hear, as they drive APA towards the boilerplate ALPA acquisition agreement presented to any independent union in the past.


We will continue to provide the full picture without revealing closed session negotiating priorities, which is what closed sessions are designed to protect. THANKFULLY - Unique to APA, our union… your BOS Reps are free to share the facts in our Domicile communications. Sunlight is the best disinfectant. We encourage you to share this email with your friends and peers from all domiciles, as we only have the ability to email the pilots of BOS. 


OVERVIEW:

We have serious concerns with the pace of negotiations, the lack of progress in key areas, and the projected expenditure of member money. Please allow us to break it down further, as accountability and transparency are essential to ensure APA members are being fairly represented.


TIMELINE:

We learned during this meeting, that the ALPA negotiations are expected to take Six months longer than what the BOD’s previously briefed timeline was when it voted to form the AAMNC. At the time of the vote to form the AAMNC, the most accurate and recent information, provided to the BOD from the original 2023 ALPA exploratory committee, was that from the start of negotiations (after due diligence exchanges), it would take approximately five months to reach a full Agreement In Principle (AIP) for the BOD to vote on. See the timeline photos below. 


The first formal negotiation between the current AAMNC (formed in MAY 25) and ALPA was in NOV 25, so based on the previous timeline brief, our expectation was that negotiations would conclude no later than APR 26. 

Your BOS Reps were blindsided with an AAMNC briefing revealing a timeline that this process will likely continue through OCT 26! Eleven months from start of formal negotiations, far longer than the previously briefed five months. From the formation of the AAMNC: almost eighteen months!


Noteworthy is that the member of the original ALPA exploratory committee and the hired outside-advisor of that committee that briefed the inaccurate and misleading timeline, are both members of the current AAMNC. How could there be such a gross disparity? We have to ask ourselves why the overpromising to the BOD in 2023 and again when we formed the AAMNC?


When the BOD vote took place to form the AAMNC, it was our understanding that ALPA negotiations would be complete well before the start of Section Six early openers that occur in AUG 26. The “timeline as we know it” has been updated so that the official end of the ALPA negotiations process, and preparations for our negotiations for a new CBA, will OVERLAP.  


Section Six CBA early openers will now occur
before the ALPA question is fully decided. 

You have told us directly, in person, and through concourse conversations that this is unacceptable. 

Remember that the President of APA, FO Nick Silva, is an ex-officio member of the AAMNC. In our view as your BOS Reps, from what you have consistently provided to us in your feedback, it is unacceptable to divide APA resources, the President’s attention, and overall union resources during Section Six.  


Of further note, numerous attempts to provide the AAMNC with negotiating leverage by putting a “flag in the ground” on a targeted end-date before Section Six openers have been repeatedly rejected by a majority of the BOD. As such with no urgency, ALPA is slow rolling, only agreeing to negotiating sessions with us once a month. To date, ALPA has shown no willingness to advance their timeline, call any special meetings or spend any additional resources while we capitulate, call special meetings, and spend more and more of your money each month. 


MISSING FROM AAMNC UPDATE:

The committee chose only to release positive news, we cannot speak to the motivation behind that choice, only that this is not typical of a negotiating posture. That being said, we can shine a light on some items that were NOT in the update from the AAMNC: 


There was no mention of union dues, 
WHY?

ALPA has no intention of matching our industry leading 1.0% (1.5% in Section Six) nominal dues rate as part of these negotiations. ALPA simply cannot run their business model, where the larger pilot groups subsidize the smaller ones, at our superior 1% dues rate. Supporting the National ALPA HQ in McLean, VA and all the added expenditures of a large bureaucracy simply cannot be done in the efficient way we are able to at APA. 


In fact, to date ALPA has no intention of calling a special meeting to finalize dues rates unless we FIRST agree to an ALPA acquisition of APA resources. They will likely attempt to use the $90M in annual dues revenue we would bring as leverage to lower dues at our peers of DALPA & UALPA. We’re sure our peers at those pilot groups will welcome using our money for their personal benefit.


Let it sink-in that based on the current timeline briefed by the AAMNC, if a proposed acquisition agreement is reached, it appears the BOD will be asked to approve, and subsequently the American Airlines pilots, asked to ratify, something CONTINGENT on ALPA doing something after the fact on dues rates.


We all remember the “you have to vote for it to see what’s in it” line- well, that is where we currently find ourselves in these negotiations. We’re sure you find this as contemptuous as we do. 


The APA President, as ex-officio member of the AAMNC, has acknowledged there is no scenario where our dues stay the same or are lowered if we join ALPA. We will be paying more, so that other ALPA pilot groups may pay less.

ALPA may lower their dues in any case, as we set the benchmark that they can’t obtain- but their dues will be lowered by a smaller amount if we don’t reach an agreement to be acquired, and bring your dues dollars to the equation. In all scenarios we will be paying higher dues so that ALPA pilots can pay less. 


Expect ALPA to obfuscate this APA advantage, 
with slick terms like “effective dues rate”, and attempts to use a shell-game of optional dues refunds to hide the nominal ALPA dues rate of 1.85%. APA has been at a zero dues rate for months, but we don’t need to use that to show we have the industry leading rate and achieved a parity CBA, because it isn’t a forward-looking guarantee.


Even if they lower their dues, we will still be paying more, if acquired by ALPA.


We know you’re smart enough to see through it. We expect that our AAMNC relies solely on nominal rate comparisons, we expect you will as well. Dues refunds and dues holidays are like profit-sharing… we have the same formula, but our airline is far less profitable, so we suffer.


Don’t fall for “effective” dues rate disguises by ALPA
, promises of refunds, etc. and don’t accept them from our AAMNC, we will not.


Aeromedical, Benefits & IT: 
It is undisputed that APA has the industry leading in-house aeromedical staff, benefits programs & staff, and pilot-facing IT applications & staff. Also missing from the AAMNC update:


There was no mention by the Committee of any agreement to protect our gold standard in-house Aeromedical staff and retain independent control of our personalized Aeromedical services in perpetuity. 


The devil is in the details, and the key words in the AAMNC update are “Subject to further due diligence by ALPA” (photo below). This isn’t a surprise, because ALPA has no in-house aeromedical support, instead they have a services agreement with a third-party vendor, named AMAS. 


All surveys across the domiciles have shown that aeromedical being outsourced to AMAS is a redline in these negotiations for our pilots. It is reasonable given ALPA’s structure that the other ALPA pilot groups that are forced to use an outside vendor will not look favorably upon American Airlines pilots having a unique aeromedical carve out.

We will update you, if and when, the Committee is able to secure an agreement which would guarantee that AA pilots will never be forced to outsource our Aeromedical staff and support if we became part of ALPA.


Additionally, there was nothing in the Committee’s briefing regarding any agreement to protect our gold standard in-house Benefits staff and retain independent control of our personalized Benefit Plans in perpetuity. 


The devil is in the details, and the key words in the AAMNC update are “On the Effective Date of the merger” (photo below). There appears to be nothing that guarantees, or even suggests, that we would be able to KEEP our industry-leading benefit plans and support staff in-house, after that date. 


Should we be acquired by ALPA: The reduced amount of dues money an AA Master Executive Council (MEC) would be able to keep for our exclusive use is less than ≈40% of dues collected, after contributing to the National ALPA structure.

Choices would have to be made to triage the myriads of services that we now provide to the APA members, that we can afford now by virtue of keeping all of our member dues. As you see in the second bullet below- we keep the full cost, but with ≈60% less of our members’ money available after ALPA National takes their cut. 


Finally, there is no agreement in principle yet to protect our gold standard in-house IT support and the APA owned pilot-facing APP: APA PILOT, in perpetuity. 


The devil is in the details, and the AAMNC update fails to even mention these resources which consistently poll at the top of APA members’ satisfaction. There is nothing that guarantees, or even suggests, that we would be able to keep our in-house App and support staff after the Effective Date of being acquired by ALPA. We will update you if such an agreement is reached. 


IT’S YOUR MONEY:

Extensive time and money are being spent due to APA staff and subject matter experts (SME’s) working above their normal task-load to support the AAMNC. BOD time is being expended during regular meetings and in special meetings. APA resources, outside advisors’ fees, and legal expenses are being paid. Every day this negotiation goes on, the more membership dues are being expended.


We now know from this recent meeting the BOD was overpromised on the timeline and, as such negotiations will likely cost far more than anticipated due to nearly double the expected time requirement.


$1.6M of APA member dues has been spent on ALPA exploration and negotiation to date, and now we learned we still have an expected ten more months. 


The AAMNC has been on full-time union leave at 105 hours per month, since JUN25, and will continue as such. We are paying the same outside advisor that we paid during the original exploratory committee in 2022-23 to advise the AAMNC.


We question the value
of that “expert” expense, considering that the timeline was so inaccurate when all the same issues existed in 2023, and subsequent BOD voting decisions forming the AAMNC were made in accordance with false timelines. 


As you can see in the chart below there is significant member money being spent above the $3M allotted to the AAMNC, who has spent roughly $600K of their budget, to date. We are very concerned about the higher cost, due to the new protracted timeline.


You have made it very clear to us in your direct communications to us as your BOS Reps, that you would prefer that your hard-earned dues dollars be spent on building up the APA Negotiating Department and hiring more full-time Economic and Financial Analysis (E&FA) staff at APAHQ in anticipation of Section Six openers as early as AUG 26. 


We promise to continue shining the light of transparency and accountability on the AAMNC (and across APA) to ensure our dues dollars, that we work so hard to earn, are spent responsibly. The chart below contains data from the member-facing Financials page of the APA website. 


JAN Domicile Meeting

We will host an in-person Domicile Meeting at Logan on FRI 30JAN from 1000-1400ET, to receive your input, and provide you with APA subject matter expert (SME) briefings. The meeting precedes the winter regular quarterly Board of Directors (BOD) meeting, which is scheduled for the first week of FEB. More details with the location, RSVP link, and expected speakers, to follow.


BOS Staff Holiday Gift

Last Chance! As we celebrate this season of giving, please consider our BOS Admin Staff, who are always there to support the APA pilots of Boston. Every little bit helps to make their holiday brighter. Every single dollar will stay in BOS only. 21DEC Deadline Link: Brighten the holidays for our BOS Admin Staff 


Thanks for making it through this lengthy edition of the weekend Boston Gazette.
We’ll see you on the line and in BOS operations. Happy Holidays!


The best way to reach us is by the email below, or by telephone. If you wish to reach all National and Domicile Officers as well as select National Committees and APA Staff members in a single click, send a SoundOff: HERE.


In Solidarity,

Larry & Tom

Larry: 603-717-1611

Tom: 781-367-5669

BOS-Reps@alliedpilots.org

BOSTON STRONG 

Upcoming Events

Below is a list of upcoming APA domicile and national meetings. Motions and resolutions are being brought to the floor in these meetings to further erode APA and promote the ALPA coup. We encourage you to attend these meetings to voice your opinions and vote on these important matters. Now is the time to engage in your future representation.

02/02/2026 through 02/06/2026

Winter APA Board of Directors Meeting

08:00

-

12:00

APA Headquarters

02/02/2026 through 02/06/2026

Winter APA Board of Directors Meeting

08:00

-

12:00

APA Headquarters

Contact Us

Drop us a line!

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Copyright © 2026 San Jacinto Group - All Rights Reserved.

Powered by

  • AA Pilots ALPA History
  • TWA ALPA History
  • Eagle ALPA History
  • Recall Brian Smith
  • APA As a Leader
  • False ALPA Narratives
  • The Longest Election
  • Delta Pilots Assn “DPA”
  • UAL 4/3/3 Pro Negotiators
  • ALPA DFR Losses
  • AWAPPA = ALPA
  • Management Wants ALPA
  • Battle of San Jacinto

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept